Posted by Philip St. Romain on August 25, 19100 at 07:29:32:
In Reply to: Re: prayer and consciousness posted by johnboy on August 22, 19100 at 15:26:11:
: Phil wrote: "Well, give me awhile to ponder all this and I'll put something up." and "But. . . just what, exactly . . . Oh, never mind!"
: Wait a minute old buddy; I know EXACTLY what you were going to ask.
Yes, you pretty much did.
: Before we put our epistemological tools to the global ethic task, it is
: VITALLY IMPORTANT that we ask the questions who, what, when , where, how
: and why of truth, beauty, goodness and love.
Yes, this part is especially important. An old philosophical adage has it that the knowing is known in the mode of the knower--a good thing to keep in mind when considering the meaning of scripture, dogmas, etc.
: The manifold and multiform answers have concrete expressions in reality for
: individuals and cultures: doctrines which articulate the truth encounter,
: rituals which celebrate the encounter with beauty, laws which preserve the
: goodness experienced and social entities where interpersonal dynamics gift
: us with love (and hate, but let's not go there).
Yes, and some might regard this as a problem, but, on the other hand, it does attest to the grandeur of the mystery encountered.
: It is therefore no small wonder that primary encounters with reality result
: in so many creeds, codes, cults and community structures:
Quite so, but as one grows in the spirit, this is not viewed as a "problem." Only people in the early stages of the faith want everything to be the same everywhere.
: Presuming that Why we ask these questions in the first place is to obtain
: answers which will direct the commitment of our resources to action.
Yes, or because the questions are a "gift" of the Creator to lead us to find Him/Her.
: WHAT comes out of this consideration is not a deconstruction of the great
: traditions and ideologies but the deabsolutizing of secondary expressions
: that result from our primary encounters with (ultimate) reality.
OK.
: It is this deabsolutizing that will take our intuition of unity in
: diversity to a level never before enjoyed on our planet.
But it can only be deabsolutized in minds that have moved beyond either-or thinking.
: The dynamism of this VERY MAJOR paradigm shift is: "Awaken to Solidarity
: that Compassion may Ensue!" And this is the apophatic complement to: "If
: you want peace, work for justice". One approach is trophotropic and the
: other ergotropic. At their extremes they could be considered quietism and
: pelagianism. And you know what? Extremes are useful, indeed good, but they
: aren't THE picture. Why are they good? It is when there are NO extremes
: that one might get worried: it means you have no middle.
Good point.
: Shalomplace definitely has a middle for here I am on the edge. Thanks for letting me muddle.
'Twas a pleasure to hear from you again. Thanks for your reflections.
Phil